Agricultural Law Weekly Review
The Agricultural Law Weekly Review provides an update of recent agricultural law developments from local, state, national, and international levels. Subscribe for updates.
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—February 13, 2024
Dairy Policy: Federal Milk Marketing Order Hearing Ends, Brief Filing Open Until April 1 🌾
On February 2, 2024, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) received an order “Notification to the Hearing Clerk Pursuant to 7 CFR § 900.10” for the National Federal Milk Marketing Order Pricing Formula Hearing, which began on August 23, 2023 and ended after forty-nine days on January 30, 2024. According to the notice, 511 exhibits were introduced in the hearing. Additionally, USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) will publish forty-nine volumes of the hearing transcript on its website. Proposed transcript corrections may be […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—February 5, 2024
Agribusiness: Kubota Enjoined from Labeling Imported Products as ‘Made in USA,’ Will Pay $2 Million 🌾
On January 25, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a stipulated order permanently enjoining Kubota North America from claiming that its products are “Made in the United States” (MUSA) when the products do not comply with the “Made in USA Labeling Rule” (16 C.F.R. Part 323). United States v. Kubota North America Corporation, No. 3:24-cv-00159. According to a complaint filed by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Kubota “incorrectly […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—January 29, 2024
Water Quality: EPA Publishes Proposed Rule for Meat and Poultry Point Source Effluent Limitations 🌾
On January 23, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published in the Federal Register a proposed rule (89 FR 4474) to amend Meat and Poultry Products Effluent Guidelines and Standards. Initially announced by EPA on December 15, 2023, the 2024 Proposed Rule offers three options, the first of which EPA claims as the agency’s preferred option. According to the proposed rule, Option 1 “would include new phosphorus limits and revised nitrogen limits for large direct dischargers and new pretreatment standards on […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—January 24, 2024
National Agricultural Policy: Continuing Resolution Funds Government, Agriculture Until March 1, 2024 🌾
On January 19, 2024, President Joe Biden signed into law continuing resolution H.R.2872, which maintains the funding levels established in the 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act (P.L. 117–328) for “Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies” and other government programs and agencies until March 1, 2024. The programs were previously funded through January 19, 2024, under continuing resolution H.R.6363, passed November 16, 20223. Congress passed the continuing resolutions in the absence of a 2024 Consolidated Appropriations Act.
National Agricultural Policy: GAO Publishes Report on […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—January 18, 2024
Ag-Gag Statutes: Eighth Circuit Reverses Injunctions for Two Iowa ‘Ag-Gag’ Laws 🌾
On January 8, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued two opinions in separate cases reversing injunctions against two so-called Iowa “ag-gag” laws for First Amendment violations and remanding each case. Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Reynolds, No. 22-1830 (4:19-cv-00124, S.D. Iowa, filed Apr. 19, 2019) and Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Reynolds, No. 22-3464 (4:21-cv-00231, S.D. Iowa, filed Aug. 10, 2021). In the first opinion (22-1830), the plaintiffs had challenged Iowa’s “Agricultural Production Facility Trespass” law (Iowa Code § 717A.3B), […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—January 8, 2024
Animal Welfare: California’s Proposition 12 Fully Effective January 1, 2024, Producer Certification Required 🌾
On January 1, 2024, California’s Proposition 12 and implementing regulations became fully effective, establishing the state’s Animal Care Program and requiring third-party certification for producers (HSC §§ 25990-25994 and 3 CCR §§ 1320-1327.3). According to a publication from the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA), as of January 1, 2024, (1) “[p]roducers are required to have a valid Certificate of Compliance,” (2) “[c]overed products sold are required to be from producers with valid Certificates of Compliance,” and (3) “[d]istributors are required to […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—December 22, 2023
Agribusiness: Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements Effective January 1, 2024 🌾
On January 1, 2024, the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements (31 CFR § 1010.380) become effective for many companies and small entities as part of the Corporate Transparency Act, enacted within the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, P.L. 116–283. The law requires that domestic and foreign reporting companies formed by “filing a document with a secretary of state or any similar office” report certain information about itself, its beneficial owners, and its
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—December 15, 2023
Antitrust: Federal Jury Finds Egg Producers Liable for Price-Fixing and Conspiracy, Damages Awarded 🌾
On November 21, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered a minute entry of a jury verdict finding the defendant egg producers liable in an antitrust case alleging that numerous egg producers—including United Egg Producers, Inc., United States Egg Marketers, Inc., and Cal-Maine Foods—“unlawfully agreed to and did implement their conspiracy to control supply and artificially maintain and increase the price of eggs through a series of collective actions.” Kraft Foods Global v. United Egg Producers, No. 1:11-cv-08808. The case […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—December 4, 2023
International Trade: Panel Report Finds Canada’s Dairy Tariff-Rate Quotas ‘Not Inconsistent’ with USMCA 🌾
On November 10, 2023, the dispute settlement panel formed under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) published its final report concerning Canada’s dairy tariff-rate quota (TRQ) allocation measures. Also announced by the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), the report concluded that “Canada’s measures are not inconsistent with the USMCA provisions cited by the United States.” However, “[a] dissenting panelist agreed with the United States that by excluding retailers and others, Canada was breaching its commitment to make its dairy TRQs available to all applicants active in the […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—November 20, 2023
Antitrust: DOJ Files Complaint, Proposed Consent Decree to Prohibit Koch Foods’ Contract Termination Penalty Fees 🌾
On November 9, 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, a complaint alleging that poultry producer Koch Foods, Inc. “anticompetitively and unfairly required chicken farmers, or growers, to pay Koch a termination penalty to switch from working for Koch to a rival chicken processor.” United States v. Koch Foods, No. 1:23-cv-15813. Also announced by DOJ, the complaint states that “Koch’s termination penalty . . amounted to more than half of […]
