HomeTag: WOTUS

WOTUS

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending July 30, 2021

Animal Welfare:  Federal Appeals Court Upholds California’s Proposition 12 With Five Months Until Its Effective Date 🌾
On July 28, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision in Nat’l Pork Producers Council, et al v. Karen Ross, et al, No. 20-55631, holding that California’s Proposition 12 in-state production animal confinement standards and in-state sales restriction for products not produced in accordance with them, do not violate the United States Constitution’s Commerce Clause.  In upholding Proposition 12’s constitutionality, the Court affirmed the earlier decision upholding Proposition 12 issued by the U. S. District Court for […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending July 23, 2021

WOTUS: County of Maui Filing Requests Court to Follow EPA Guidance, No Need for NPDES Permit 🌾
On July 21, 2021, in response to the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii’s July 15, 2021 ruling that the County of Maui (County) must obtain a Clean Water Act National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for its wastewater injection well disposal, Defendant County of Maui filed an analysis of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) January 2021 guidance memorandum, “Applying the Supreme Court’s County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Decision in the Clean Water Act Section 402 […]

July 26th, 2021|Tags: , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending July 16, 2021

WOTUS: Federal Court Grants EPA Request to Remand and Leaves Navigable Waters Protection Rule in Place 🌾
On July 15, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina issued an order granting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) motion to remand without vacatur the Navigable Waters Protection Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States” (85 FR 22250) (NWPR).  South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. Wheeler, No. 2:20-cv-01687.  The court, which had previously stayed the case to allow for the administration change and EPA review of the rule, declined to explain its ruling in […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending June 11, 2021

WOTUS: EPA Requests Remand and Announces Intent to Rewrite WOTUS Definition 🌾
On June 9, 2021, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) filed a motion in litigation pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts requesting the remand without vacatur of the agency’s April 2020 Navigable Waters Protection Rule (NWPR) (85 FR 22250), defining “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act, for the express reason that EPA plans to attempt another re-write of the WOTUS definition. Conservation Law Foundation v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 1:20-cv-10820.  According to EPA’s accompanying

June 14th, 2021|Tags: , , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending April 23, 2021

WOTUS:  EPA Administrator Testifies on WOTUS 🌾
On April 21, 2021, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Michael Regan testified about EPA’s approach to the presently applicable Navigable Waters Protection Rule before the House Committee On Appropriations, Subcommittee on Interior, Environment and Related Agencies.  He stated, “What I’m pledging to do is begin a stakeholder-engagement process involving our ag community — farm bureau, ag CEOs, our environmental community — to look at the lessons learned and how we can move forward . . . that we can provide some certainty to the ag industry where we don’t overburden the small farmer […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—Week Ending March 19, 2021

Water Quality: Exelon’s Conowingo Dam Relicensed As Per Settlement with Maryland 🌾
On March 18, 2021, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a new 50-year license to Exelon Generation Company, LLC’s Conowingo Hydroelectric Project, the nearly century-old dam located on the Susquehanna River in Maryland approximately ten miles north of its entry to the Chesapeake Bay.  Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Project Nos. 405-106 and 405-121, 174 FERC ¶ 61,217. In recent years it was discovered that previous modeling of phosphorous, nitrogen and sediment trapped behind the dam were flawed and pollutants previously assumed to be trapped behind the dam […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—Week Ending March 5, 2021

Animal Welfare: U.S. Supreme Court Petitioned to Hear Commerce Clause Challenge to California’s Proposition 12 🌾
On February 26, 2021, the North American Meat Institute (NAMI) filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court requesting that it hear an appeal of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ decision that California’s Proposition 12 does not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause in establishing animal confinement standards for all pork and veal products sold in the state. A response is due from the California Attorney General by April 2, 2021.  North American Meat Institute v. Xavier Becerra, […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending January 15, 2021

Agricultural Labor: Maryland Court of Appeals Finds Tyson Farms Not Co-Employer of Poultry Farm Employee
On November 20, 2020, the Court of Appeals of Maryland issued an opinion reversing the decision of the Maryland Court of Special Appeals and finding that Tyson Farms was not a co-employer of a Maryland poultry farm worker who sustained an occupational lung disease during his employment and residence on a Worcester County chicken farm.  In overturning a jury verdict from the Circuit Court for Worcester County, which found Tyson not to be a joint employer, the majority of a Maryland Court of Special Appeals panel reversed the trial court and determined that Tyson was a co-employer with the farm owner—who had failed to carry worker’s compensation insurance—and […]

January 15th, 2021|Tags: , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending September 11, 2020

Water Quality: Lawsuits filed against EPA over Pa and NY Chesapeake Bay
On September 10, 2020, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and the states of Maryland, Virginia, Delaware, and the District of Columbia filed separate complaints against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) seeking to invalidate New York and Pennsylvania’s Chesapeake Bay Agreement nutrient reduction plans and compel EPA Secretary Andrew Wheeler to ensure state compliance with the Chesapeake Bay Agreement nutrient reduction goals.  (Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 1:20-cv-02529; State of Maryland v. Wheeler, No. 1:20-cv-02530).  Filed in the U.S. District Court […]

September 15th, 2020|Tags: , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending August 14, 2020

Right to Farm: Supreme Court Filing Challenges Indiana’s Right to Farm Act
On July 17, 2020, the Plaintiffs in the case Himsel v. Himsel (Ind. Ct. App. 18A-PL-00645) filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court (docket No. 20-72) challenging the constitutionality of Indiana’s Right to Farm Act. The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendants, dismissing the Plaintiffs’ claim that the “noxious emissions” from a neighboring concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) constituted “nuisance, negligence, and trespass” (No. 32D04-1510-PL-000150). The Plaintiffs claim that the act violates the Takings Clause of […]