Checkoff Programs
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—June 19, 2023
Pesticides/Herbicides: Environmental Groups Challenge EPA’s Registration of Enlist One and Enlist Duo 🌾
On June 6, 2023, the Center for Food Safety and two other advocacy groups filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seeking injunctive and declaratory relief against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) registration decision for Enlist One and Enlist Duo. Ctr. for Food Safety v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, No. 1:23-cv-01633. In January 2022, EPA granted an extended seven-year registration for the two herbicides in 34 states, which may be expanded to six other states pending a […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—Week Ending July 29, 2022
Antitrust: Justice Department Files Complaint and Proposed Consent Decrees in Poultry Plant Worker and Contract Grower Compensation Conspiracy 🌾
On July 25, 2022, the United States Justice Department (DOJ) announced that it filed a civil antitrust complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland alleging meat producers Cargill Inc., Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Sanderson Farms Inc. and Wayne Farms LLC conspired to suppress worker pay, together with data consulting firm Webber, Meng, Sahl and Company (WMS) and its President, G. Jonathan Meng. Additionally, the DOJ proposed ten-year consent decrees as to all defendants and
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending October 8, 2021
Biofuels: Biofuel Advocacy Group Files Supreme Court Petition for Review of E15 Vacatur 🌾
On October 7, 2021, biofuel advocacy group Growth Energy filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the court to review the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s July 2021 vacatur of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) rule allowing year-round sales of fifteen percent ethanol fuel blend (E15). Growth Energy v. American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al., No. 21-519. Growth Energy previously filed for a rehearing of the case, which was denied by […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending July 30, 2021
Animal Welfare: Federal Appeals Court Upholds California’s Proposition 12 With Five Months Until Its Effective Date 🌾
On July 28, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision in Nat’l Pork Producers Council, et al v. Karen Ross, et al, No. 20-55631, holding that California’s Proposition 12 in-state production animal confinement standards and in-state sales restriction for products not produced in accordance with them, do not violate the United States Constitution’s Commerce Clause. In upholding Proposition 12’s constitutionality, the Court affirmed the earlier decision upholding Proposition 12 issued by the U. S. District Court for […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending September 25, 2020
Industrial Hemp: Lawsuit Challenges DEA Hemp Interim Final Rule
On September 18, 2020, the Hemp Industries Association (HIA) and RE Botanicals filed, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, a petition for review (Hemp Industries Association, et al v. DEA, et al, Docket No. 20-01376) challenging the August 21, 2020 interim final rule (85 FR 51639) issued by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Additionally, on September 18, 2018, the Hemp Industries Association submitted a comment on the DEA’s interim rule, see Docket: DEA-2020-0023. The primary claim in both Hemp Industries […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—April 2, 2020
COVID-19 Pandemic: Congress Enacts Three Laws Providing Pandemic Assistance
Over the last few weeks, the U.S. Congress has enacted three new federal laws providing COVID-19 pandemic assistance benefits and programs to individuals and businesses, including agricultural stakeholders.
On March 5 and 6, 2020, respectively, Congress enacted and the President signed the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020, H.R. 6074 (P.L. 116-123), providing $8.3 billion in emergency funding, which includes appropriations for several Small Business Administration (SBA) financial assistance and loan programs for which agricultural producers are eligible.
On March 18, 2020, Congress enacted and the President signed the Families First […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—August 29, 2019
Checkoff Programs: Court Dismisses Challenge Regarding Use of Pork Checkoff Funds
On August 23, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit dismissed a lawsuit alleging that the government improperly used funds collected under the pork checkoff program (Humane Society of the United States v. Perdue, No. 18-5188). Under the Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act, the government may collect “assessments” from producers for the purpose of “strengthen[ing] the position of the pork industry in the marketplace.” Known as “checkoffs,” these assessments are paid by producers to the National Pork Board (Board) who in turn uses the […]
