Pesticides
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – October 31, 2019
Industrial Hemp/Cannabis: USDA Releases Interim Final Rule for Domestic Hemp Production
On October 29, 2019, USDA publicly announced and released the text of its interim regulations governing domestic hemp production. The interim final rule implements Section 10113 of the 2018 Farm Bill and various new sections of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, which it amended. Once published in the Federal Register, the rule will be immediately effective and expire after two years. In the meantime, there will be a 60-day comment period and thereafter USDA anticipates issuing its final rule. The rule adds new part 990 (“Domestic Hemp Production”) to 7 CFR. As stated […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – October 24, 2019
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – October 17, 2019
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—August 29, 2019
Checkoff Programs: Court Dismisses Challenge Regarding Use of Pork Checkoff Funds
On August 23, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit dismissed a lawsuit alleging that the government improperly used funds collected under the pork checkoff program (Humane Society of the United States v. Perdue, No. 18-5188). Under the Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act, the government may collect “assessments” from producers for the purpose of “strengthen[ing] the position of the pork industry in the marketplace.” Known as “checkoffs,” these assessments are paid by producers to the National Pork Board (Board) who in turn uses the […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—August 15, 2019
Pesticides: EPA Will Not Approve Labels Asserting that Glyphosate Causes Cancer
On August 8, 2019, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a press release stating that the agency “will no longer approve product labels claiming glyphosate is known to cause cancer.” According to EPA, such claims are false and as such do “not meet the labeling requirements of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.” EPA’s statement is a direct reaction to California’s Proposition 65 which requires an established list of chemicals determined by the state to “cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm.” If a chemical is on the list, […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—August 8, 2019
Pesticides: California Couple Agrees to Reduced Roundup Damage Award
On July 26, 2019, Plaintiffs Alva and Alberta Pilliod agreed to reduce a jury award from over $2 billion to over $86 million for alleged harm caused by Monsanto Company’s glyphosate-based weed killer Roundup (Pilliod, et al. v. Monsanto Company, et al. Case No RG17862702). The Pilliods alleged that exposure to Roundup caused them both to develop non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. On May 13, 2019, a California jury found that Monsanto Company’s actions regarding its product Roundup entitled Mr. Pilliod to over $37 million for economic and noneconomic loss and $1 billion in punitive […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—July 25, 2019
Pesticides: Court Reduces Jury Award in Roundup Case
On July 17, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California reduced a jury damage award regarding the herbicide Roundup from over $80 million to over $25 million (Hardeman v Monsanto Company, 3:16-cv-00525). Previously, a jury found that plaintiff Edwin Hardeman’s non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was caused by Monsanto’s glyphosate-based herbicide Roundup. According to the jury, Monsanto had negligently failed to warm Mr. Hardeman of the risks associated with Roundup. As a result, Mr. Hardeman was awarded $5,267,634.10 in compensatory damages and $75,000,000 in punitive damages. The court ruled, however, that while “[t]he […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—July 18, 2019
Dairy Policy: PA Milk Marketing Board Proposes Extension to Notice Requirement to Terminate Dealer-Producer Contracts
On July 13, 2019, the Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board (MMB) published notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin of a proposed rule to extend the Commonwealth’s dairy dealer-producer contract termination notice requirement from 28 days to 90 days (49 Pa.B. 3606). According to MMB, the proposed extension is to allow dairy producers additional time to secure alternate outlets for their products prior to a termination. The proposed rule, however, does provide dealers with an exception to the 90-day termination notice requirement if the dealer experiences “financial hardship, […]
