HomeTag: Crop Insurance

Crop Insurance

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending July 3, 2020

COVID-19: Paycheck Protection Program Extended
On June 30 and July 1, 2020, the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives respectively passed S.4116, which extends the June 30, 2020 Paycheck Protection Program application deadline to August 8, 2020.  The bill awaits the President’s signature.

Crop Insurance: Notice of Loss Filing Requirements Eased
On July 2, 2020, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Farm Service Agency (FSA) announced several “flexibilities” for producers filing a Notice of Loss on both insured and uninsured crops for prevented planted acres and failed crops.  RMA states that a Notice of Loss “can be filed before completing the crop acreage report,” […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – October 3, 2019

State Regulation: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Concludes that the Nutrient Management Act Preempts Local Regulation of Non-Concentrated Agricultural Operations

On September 26, 2019, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reversed the Commonwealth Court’s order, holding that local governments cannot impose stricter nutrient management requirements on small farms than those already imposed upon large agricultural operations under the state Nutrient Management Act (NMA) (Russell Berner, et al., v. Montour Township, et al., No. 39 MAP 2018).  The question of whether and to what extent the NMA preempts local regulation of agricultural operations that are not “concentrated agricultural operations” (CAOs) became the central issue of this […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—August 29, 2019

Checkoff Programs: Court Dismisses Challenge Regarding Use of Pork Checkoff Funds
On August 23, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit dismissed a lawsuit alleging that the government improperly used funds collected under the pork checkoff program (Humane Society of the United States v. Perdue, No. 18-5188).  Under the Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act, the government may collect “assessments” from producers for the purpose of “strengthen[ing] the position of the pork industry in the marketplace.”  Known as “checkoffs,” these assessments are paid by producers to the National Pork Board (Board) who in turn uses the […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—August 22, 2019

Right to Farm Laws: Missouri CAFO Closes Following Nuisance Lawsuits
On August 19, 2019, Valley Oaks Steak Co. announced that the Missouri-based company was closing operations due to numerous lawsuits following a proposed expansion of a concentrated feeding operation (CAFO).  Previously, on July 30, 2019, the law firm of Humphrey, Farrington & McClain (HFM) announced that 141 property owners had filed suit in the Jackson County Circuit Court regarding a proposed CAFO expansion located in Lone Jack, Missouri.  According to HFM, the CAFO—which is owned by Valley Oaks Steak Co.—has been in operation since 2016.  HMF stated that Valley Oaks Steak Co. was seeking […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—July 18, 2019

Dairy Policy: PA Milk Marketing Board Proposes Extension to Notice Requirement to Terminate Dealer-Producer Contracts
On July 13, 2019, the Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board (MMB) published notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin of a proposed rule to extend the Commonwealth’s dairy dealer-producer contract termination notice requirement from 28 days to 90 days (49 Pa.B. 3606).  According to MMB, the proposed extension is to allow dairy producers additional time to secure alternate outlets for their products prior to a termination.  The proposed rule, however, does provide dealers with an exception to the 90-day termination notice requirement if the dealer experiences “financial hardship, […]

July 18th, 2019|Tags: , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—June 27, 2019

Food Policy: SCOTUS Rules USDA Does Not Need to Disclose Certain SNAP Information Under FOIA
On June 24, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court held that under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) does not need to disclose certain private commercial or financial information from retail stores that participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) (Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media, Docket No. 18-481).  Previously, Argus Leader Media filed a FOIA request seeking the names and addresses of all retail stores that participated in SNAP for fiscal years 2005 through 2010.  Additionally, […]