Conservation Programs
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—October 29, 2024
Today at Noon—Oct. 29, 2024: Raw Milk—An Overview of State Raw Milk Regulations
Avian Influenza: Pennsylvania Issues General Quarantine Order for Birds and Avian Products 🌾
On October 26, 2024, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin a notice of a General Quarantine Order (54 Pa.B. 6717) “establishing a temporary prohibition against the display, exhibit or presence of birds and avian products at any Venue or Fair” in the state unless the birds or products meet certain standards under sections eight and nine of the order—primarily a determination by PDA that the venue and/or the […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—October 11, 2024
Agricultural Labor: Federal Court Partially Enjoins 2023 H-2A Adverse Effect Wage Calculation Rule 🌾
On September 18, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana issued a memorandum opinion partially granting a preliminary injunction against the Department of Labor’s (DOL) February 2023 final rule, which amended the H-2A adverse effect wage rate (AEWR) calculations to include data from non-agricultural occupations. Teche Vermilion Sugar Cane Growers Assoc. Inc v. Su, No. 6:23-cv-00831. In their complaint, the plaintiffs “challenge[d] the DOL’s decision to base the AEWR for H-2A workers who haul sugarcane from the field to […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—August 21, 2024
This Friday Aug. 23—Understanding the Basics of the H-2A Temporary Agricultural Worker Program
Pesticides: EPA Emergency Order Halts Use of Pesticide Dacthal 🌾
On August 7, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published in the Federal Register a notice of Emergency Order (89 FR 64445) immediately suspending the registration and use of all pesticides containing dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA or Dacthal), citing the danger the substance poses to pregnant women and unborn babies. Also announced by EPA, the agency states that it “has determined that continued sale, distribution, or use of DCPA products during the time required to cancel […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—May 17, 2024
Upcoming Webinar!
New Podcast Episodes!
- Agricultural Law: USDA Takes First Regulatory Steps on Carbon Credit Production (May 14, 2024)
- Farmland Energy: Agrivoltaics & Large-Scale Solar Energy in Pennsylvania Update (May 15, 2024)
Food Safety: FDA Publishes Final Rule for Pre-Harvest Agricultural Water
On May 6, 2024, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published in the Federal Register a final rule (89 FR 37448), which amends the requirements and procedures for assessing “pre-harvest agricultural water” used on covered produce, other than sprouts. Under the final […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—April 10, 2024
Conservation Programs: Fish and Wildlife Service Publishes Three Endangered Species Act Final Rules 🌾
On April 5, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Interior’s (DOI) Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) published in the Federal Register three final rules revising regulations for “Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants.” The first rule, “Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical Habitat” (89 FR 24300), amends the “procedures and criteria used for listing, reclassifying, and delisting species” and specifies that endangered and threatened species determinations shall be made “without reference to possible economic or other impacts of such determination.” The second rule, […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—January 8, 2024
Animal Welfare: California’s Proposition 12 Fully Effective January 1, 2024, Producer Certification Required 🌾
On January 1, 2024, California’s Proposition 12 and implementing regulations became fully effective, establishing the state’s Animal Care Program and requiring third-party certification for producers (HSC §§ 25990-25994 and 3 CCR §§ 1320-1327.3). According to a publication from the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA), as of January 1, 2024, (1) “[p]roducers are required to have a valid Certificate of Compliance,” (2) “[c]overed products sold are required to be from producers with valid Certificates of Compliance,” and (3) “[d]istributors are required to […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—December 15, 2023
Antitrust: Federal Jury Finds Egg Producers Liable for Price-Fixing and Conspiracy, Damages Awarded 🌾
On November 21, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered a minute entry of a jury verdict finding the defendant egg producers liable in an antitrust case alleging that numerous egg producers—including United Egg Producers, Inc., United States Egg Marketers, Inc., and Cal-Maine Foods—“unlawfully agreed to and did implement their conspiracy to control supply and artificially maintain and increase the price of eggs through a series of collective actions.” Kraft Foods Global v. United Egg Producers, No. 1:11-cv-08808. The case […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—December 4, 2023
International Trade: Panel Report Finds Canada’s Dairy Tariff-Rate Quotas ‘Not Inconsistent’ with USMCA 🌾
On November 10, 2023, the dispute settlement panel formed under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) published its final report concerning Canada’s dairy tariff-rate quota (TRQ) allocation measures. Also announced by the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), the report concluded that “Canada’s measures are not inconsistent with the USMCA provisions cited by the United States.” However, “[a] dissenting panelist agreed with the United States that by excluding retailers and others, Canada was breaching its commitment to make its dairy TRQs available to all applicants active in the […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—November 20, 2023
Antitrust: DOJ Files Complaint, Proposed Consent Decree to Prohibit Koch Foods’ Contract Termination Penalty Fees 🌾
On November 9, 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, a complaint alleging that poultry producer Koch Foods, Inc. “anticompetitively and unfairly required chicken farmers, or growers, to pay Koch a termination penalty to switch from working for Koch to a rival chicken processor.” United States v. Koch Foods, No. 1:23-cv-15813. Also announced by DOJ, the complaint states that “Koch’s termination penalty . . amounted to more than half of […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—November 14, 2023
Pesticides/Herbicides: Circuit Court Rules California’s Glyphosate Warning Requirement Violates First Amendment 🌾
On November 7, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released an opinion holding California’s Proposition 65 carcinogen warning requirement for the herbicide glyphosate violated the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. National Association of Wheat Growers v. Bonta, No. 20-16758. The court found that Proposition 65’s glyphosate warning requirement did not fall within the exceptions for compelled commercial speech under the First Amendment because the warning was “controversial” due to “a robust disagreement by reputable scientific sources” regarding the safety of glyphosate. […]
