Animal Welfare
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending August 6, 2021
Animal Welfare: Five U.S. Senators Introduce Federal Legislation to Stop Proposition 12
On August 5, 2021, a group of five U.S. Senators introduced S.2619, titled “Exposing Agricultural Trade Suppression” or “EATS Act,’’ seeking to erase the effect of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ July 28, 2021, ruling upholding California’s Proposition 12 and leaving in place its January 1, 2022 effective date. The bill proposes to prohibit states from imposing requirements on the “production of agricultural products sold or offered for sale in interstate commerce if the production . . . occurs in another state.” The bill was referred […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending July 30, 2021
Animal Welfare: Federal Appeals Court Upholds California’s Proposition 12 With Five Months Until Its Effective Date 🌾
On July 28, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision in Nat’l Pork Producers Council, et al v. Karen Ross, et al, No. 20-55631, holding that California’s Proposition 12 in-state production animal confinement standards and in-state sales restriction for products not produced in accordance with them, do not violate the United States Constitution’s Commerce Clause. In upholding Proposition 12’s constitutionality, the Court affirmed the earlier decision upholding Proposition 12 issued by the U. S. District Court for […]
Rapid Review: Window Closing on Legal Challenges to California’s Proposition 12
On July 28, 2021, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision in Nat’l Pork Producers Council, et al v. Karen Ross, et al, No. 20-55631, holding that California’s 2018 Proposition 12 swine confinement requirements for in-state production, and in-state sales restriction for pork products not produced in accordance with them, do not violate the United States Constitution’s Commerce Clause. Proposition 12 prohibits the sale of pork in California from hogs: (a) born of a sow that cannot lie down, stand up, fully extend its limbs, or turn around without touching the […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending July 2, 2021
Animal Welfare: U.S. Supreme Court Denies Review of Refusal to Grant Injunction Against California’s Proposition 12 🌾
On June 28, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States denied North American Meat Institute’s (NAMI) petition for certiorari from the refusal to grant an injunction against California’s Proposition 12 on the basis that it violates the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause. North American Meat Institute v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, et al., No. 20-1215. Proposition 12 establishes in-state animal confinement standards for egg-laying hens, veal calves, and breeding sows and prohibits the in-state sale of noncompliant products (included […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending June 25, 2021
Biofuels: U.S. Supreme Court Allows Non-Continuous Small Refinery Renewable Fuels Standard Blending Obligation Waiver Extensions 🌾
On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an opinion holding that a small refinery that previously received a waiver from Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) blending obligations may still receive an “extension” of the waiver even if it did not acquire a continuous waiver in previous years and allowed a previous exemption to lapse. HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC, et al., v. Renewable Fuels Association, et al., No. 20-472. The court found that the term “extension,” which is undefined in […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending April 23, 2021
WOTUS: EPA Administrator Testifies on WOTUS 🌾
On April 21, 2021, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Michael Regan testified about EPA’s approach to the presently applicable Navigable Waters Protection Rule before the House Committee On Appropriations, Subcommittee on Interior, Environment and Related Agencies. He stated, “What I’m pledging to do is begin a stakeholder-engagement process involving our ag community — farm bureau, ag CEOs, our environmental community — to look at the lessons learned and how we can move forward . . . that we can provide some certainty to the ag industry where we don’t overburden the small farmer […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—Week Ending March 26, 2021
COVID-19: USDA Announces New ‘Pandemic Assistance for Producers’ Initiative 🌾
On March 24, 2021, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced its new $6 billion financial assistance initiative, USDA Pandemic Assistance for Producers. Combining existing programs with new spending, the initiative aims to resolve disparities in previous assistance distribution through a four-part agenda: 1) $6 billion in Consolidated Appropriations Act and unspent coronavirus funds for new program spending, including assistance for the Dairy Donation Program, biofuels, specialty crops, and farmworker personal protective equipment; 2) $500 million in additional existing program spending, including the Specialty Crop Block Grant Program and […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—Week Ending March 5, 2021
Animal Welfare: U.S. Supreme Court Petitioned to Hear Commerce Clause Challenge to California’s Proposition 12 🌾
On February 26, 2021, the North American Meat Institute (NAMI) filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court requesting that it hear an appeal of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ decision that California’s Proposition 12 does not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause in establishing animal confinement standards for all pork and veal products sold in the state. A response is due from the California Attorney General by April 2, 2021. North American Meat Institute v. Xavier Becerra, […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending December 25, 2020
Pesticides/Herbicides: 5-Year Dicamba Registration Approval Challenged in Parallel Litigation
On December 21, 2020, the identical five entities (referred to collectively herein as the “Center for Food Safety”) who were successful in June 2020 in having the EPA registrations of three dicamba-containing herbicides vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (9th Circuit), filed a Petition for Review with the 9th Circuit seeking to have the EPA’s October 27, 2020, 5-year registration approvals of three dicamba-containing herbicides again invalidated. The petition alleges that the new registrations have been issued in violation of the Federal Insecticide, […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending October 23, 2020
Animal Welfare: Ninth Circuit Upholds Denial of Injunction Against California’s Proposition 12
On October 15, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a memorandum disposition affirming the U.S. District Court (USDC) for the Central District of California’s November 22, 2019, denial of a preliminary injunction against California’s Proposition 12. North American Meat Institute, et al. v. Becerra, et al., No. 19-56408. The underlying complaint remains pending before the district court. North American Meat Institute et al. v. Becerra, et al., 2:19-cv-08569. Proposition 12 requires that all pigs, veal calves and egg-laying hens housed in […]
