Agricultural Law Weekly Review
The Agricultural Law Weekly Review provides an update of recent agricultural law developments from local, state, national, and international levels. Subscribe for updates.
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—June 19, 2023
Pesticides/Herbicides: Environmental Groups Challenge EPA’s Registration of Enlist One and Enlist Duo 🌾
On June 6, 2023, the Center for Food Safety and two other advocacy groups filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seeking injunctive and declaratory relief against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) registration decision for Enlist One and Enlist Duo. Ctr. for Food Safety v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, No. 1:23-cv-01633. In January 2022, EPA granted an extended seven-year registration for the two herbicides in 34 states, which may be expanded to six other states pending a […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—June 12, 2023
International Trade: U.S. Initiates USMCA Dispute Settlement Consultations with Mexico on GMO Corn Ban 🌾
On June 2, 2023, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) announced that the United States has requested dispute settlement consultations with Mexico under Articles 31.2 and 31.4 of the United States-Mexico-Canada-Agreement (USMCA) concerning Mexico’s prohibition on the import of genetically modified corn for human consumption. The USTR announcement follows a June 1, 2023, letter from 62 Congress members urging the USTR to “immediately proceed with a formal USMCA dispute.” USTR’s request for dispute settlement consultations follows unsuccessful technical consultations […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—June 5, 2023
Farmland Preservation: Appraiser Pleads Guilty to Agricultural Conservation Easement Fraud 🌾
On May 12, 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that a North Carolina land appraiser, Walter “Terry” Douglas Roberts II, pleaded guilty to fraudulently inflating the value of at least eighteen agricultural conservation easements “by at least 70%,” allowing landowners to claim fraudulent tax deductions. United States v. Lewis, No. 1:21-cr-00231 (N.D. Ga.). The DOJ stated that the inflated appraisals led to more than $460 million in fraudulent tax deductions that resulted in $129 million in lost tax revenue.
Dairy Policy: FMMO Petitions on Make Allowances Clarified
On […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—May 29, 2023
Water Quality: U.S. Supreme Court Provides Definitive Clarity to Definition of Waters of the United States (WOTUS) 🌾
On May 25, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Sackett v. EPA, et al., No. 21-454, reversing and remanding the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and stating, “[W]e hold that the [Clean Water Act] extends to only those “wetlands with a continuous surface connection to bodies that are ‘waters of the United States’ in their own right,” so that they are “indistinguishable” from those waters,” citing its own earlier plurality decision in […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—May 22, 2023
Water Quality: Consent Decree Directs Ohio EPA to Develop Western Lake Erie Watershed TDML 🌾
On April 25, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Toledo Division issued a consent decree directing the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) to develop a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the Maumee River Watershed. Environmental Law & Policy Center v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, No: 3:19-cv-00295. In February 2019, the plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging that the Ohio EPA failed to take proper action, or implement an effective TMDL, to combat phosphorus and other nutrient […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—May 15, 2023
Animal Welfare: U.S. Supreme Court Finds California’s Proposition 12 Swine Confinement Standards Constitutional as Applied to All California-Retailed Pork Regardless of State of Origin 🌾
On May 11, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of National Pork Producers Council, et al. v. Ross, et al., No. 21-468, affirming the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (No. 20-55631) and dismissing all claims that California’s Proposition 12 swine production confinement standards made applicable to all pork products sold in California, regardless of state-of-origin, violated the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause.
Dairy Policy: NMPF Files FMMO […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—May 8, 2023
Conservation Programs: USDA Begins Implementation Phase of Climate-Smart Commodities Program Projects 🌾
On April 27, 2023, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced the beginning of the implementation phase of projects funded through the Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities program. With the implementation phase, USDA is launching the Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities Learning Network (Partnerships Network). This Partnership Networks allows for collaboration between projects. Producers interested in participating can find projects in their area through the project dashboard. For background, see ALWR—Dec. 16, 2022, “Conservation Programs: USDA Announces Additional $325 Million for Climate-Smart Commodities Projects” and ALWR—Sept. […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—May 1, 2023
WOTUS: Sixth Circuit Grants Administrative Stay of WOTUS Rule in Kentucky Until May 10, 2023 🌾
On April 22, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an order granting an administrative stay of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) January 2023 WOTUS final rule (WOTUS). KY v. EPA, No. 23-5343. The Sixth Circuit case is an appeal from the Kentucky federal district court’s previous complete dismissal of the case legally challenging the WOTUS final rule. The administrative stay order was entered twice, once on April 20 and again on April 22, 2023, in response […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—April 24, 2023
Water Quality: EPA Settlement Agreement of Chesapeake Bay TMDL Compliance Litigation Discloses New Pennsylvania Enforcement Policies 🌾
On April 20, 2023, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation announced that a settlement agreement had been reached, subject to court approval, in federal litigation filed by the states of Maryland, Virginia, Delaware, the District of Columbia, and multiple environmental groups against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency seeking to compel enforcement of Pennsylvania’s Chesapeake Bay nutrient and sediment reduction obligations under the Clean Water Act. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 1:20-cv-02529. For a full outline of the EPA’s new […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—April 17, 2023
Water Quality: North Dakota Federal Court Enjoins WOTUS Final Rule in 24 States 🌾
On April 12, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota issued a preliminary injunction immediately effective in 24 states against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) January 2023 WOTUS Final Rule in West Virginia v. U.S. EPA, No. 3:23-cv-00032. In addition to a previously-issued federal court injunction issued in Texas, effective in Texas and Idaho, the new injunction is effective in Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, […]
