Agricultural Law Weekly Review
The Agricultural Law Weekly Review provides an update of recent agricultural law developments from local, state, national, and international levels. Subscribe for updates.
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending October 30, 2020
Pesticides: EPA Approves Three Dicamba Products’ Registrations Until December 20, 2025
On October 27, 2020, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its decision to approve five-year registrations of three dicamba products for “over-the-top” use: Bayers’ XtendiMax and BASF’s Engenia, whose registrations were previously cancelled, and Syngenta’s Tavium, whose registration was not cancelled but set to expire December 20, 2020. DuPont’s FeXapan is not part of the approval decision and remains unapproved for any use at this time. The three decisions, and supporting documents, are posted directly to the Regulations.gov nonrulemaking docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0492 titled “
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending October 23, 2020
Animal Welfare: Ninth Circuit Upholds Denial of Injunction Against California’s Proposition 12
On October 15, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a memorandum disposition affirming the U.S. District Court (USDC) for the Central District of California’s November 22, 2019, denial of a preliminary injunction against California’s Proposition 12. North American Meat Institute, et al. v. Becerra, et al., No. 19-56408. The underlying complaint remains pending before the district court. North American Meat Institute et al. v. Becerra, et al., 2:19-cv-08569. Proposition 12 requires that all pigs, veal calves and egg-laying hens housed in […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending October 16, 2020
Antitrust: JBS Subsidiary Pilgrim’s Pride Pleads Guilty to Price-Fixing
On October 14, 2020, Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (Pilgrim’s), a wholly-owned subsidiary of JBS S.A., issued an announcement stating that it has entered into a plea agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding its involvement in broiler chicken price-fixing. According to the announcement, Pilgrim’s will pay $110,524,140 in exchange for no further charges if remaining in compliance with the plea agreement, which remains subject to approval from the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. United States v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, No. 1:20-cr-00330. Multiple over parties remain […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending October 9, 2020
Antitrust: U.S. Department of Justice Indicts Six More Poultry Executives Over Alleged Price Fixing
On October 7, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice announced a grand jury indictment in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado of six additional poultry executives for conspiring to rig bids and fix prices of U.S. broiler chickens in violation of the Sherman Act: Timothy R. Mulrenin, William Vincent Kantola, Jimmie Lee Little, William Wade Lovette, Gary Brian Roberts, and Rickie Patterson Blake. United States v. Penn, No. 1:20-cr-00152. Four indictments were previously issued in the same proceeding. […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending October 2, 2020
International Trade: USDA and FDA Sign MOU to Coordinate, Collaborate on Dairy Exports
On October 1, 2020, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced their establishment of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU 225-20-017), indicating their intent to cooperate and collaborate regarding the export of milk and milk products from the United States. Under the MOU, FAS will lead communications with foreign governments while AMS will facilitate exports and issue dairy sanitary certificates. Additionally, FDA will verify the regulatory standing of milk producers and […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending September 25, 2020
Industrial Hemp: Lawsuit Challenges DEA Hemp Interim Final Rule
On September 18, 2020, the Hemp Industries Association (HIA) and RE Botanicals filed, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, a petition for review (Hemp Industries Association, et al v. DEA, et al, Docket No. 20-01376) challenging the August 21, 2020 interim final rule (85 FR 51639) issued by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Additionally, on September 18, 2018, the Hemp Industries Association submitted a comment on the DEA’s interim rule, see Docket: DEA-2020-0023. The primary claim in both Hemp Industries […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending September 18, 2020
Biofuels: EPA Denies Sixty-Eight Small Refinery Exemptions to Renewable Fuel Standard 🌾
On September 14, 2020, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its denial of sixty-eight pending small refinery exemption (SRE) petitions requesting relief from Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) blending compliance for 2011–2018. Following the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals’ January 24, 2020 ruling in Renewable Fuels Assn. v. EPA, holding that EPA’s grant of economic hardship exemptions, rather than statutory-authorized extensions, exceeded EPA’s legal authority. Refiners filed sixty-eight petitions seeking, in various ways, to backfill their previous history of exemptions with new EPA grants of […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending September 11, 2020
Water Quality: Lawsuits filed against EPA over Pa and NY Chesapeake Bay
On September 10, 2020, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and the states of Maryland, Virginia, Delaware, and the District of Columbia filed separate complaints against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) seeking to invalidate New York and Pennsylvania’s Chesapeake Bay Agreement nutrient reduction plans and compel EPA Secretary Andrew Wheeler to ensure state compliance with the Chesapeake Bay Agreement nutrient reduction goals. (Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 1:20-cv-02529; State of Maryland v. Wheeler, No. 1:20-cv-02530). Filed in the U.S. District Court […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending September 4, 2020
Industrial Hemp: USDA Reopens Comment Period for Hemp Production Rule
On September 4, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) announced the reopening (85 FR 55363) of the comment period for the October 31, 2019 interim final rule, “Establishment of a Domestic Hemp Production Program” (84 FR 58522). USDA states that it is especially interested in comments from regulated parties operating during the 2020 production season and outlines the following twelve issues on which it particularly seeks comment:
- Measurement of Uncertainty for Sampling
- Liquid Chromatography Factor, 0.877
- Disposal and Remediation of Non-Compliant Plants
- Negligence
- Interstate […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending August 28, 2020
COVID-19: FDA and OSHA Publish Food Operation COVID-19 Checklist
On August 19, 2020 the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) published a checklist titled, “Employee Health and Food Safety Checklist for Human and Animal Food Operations During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” intended to serve as a quick guide for domestic and foreign producers, manufacturers, and processors of FDA-regulated human and animal food. The checklist is divided into two categories: 1) employee health and work environment logistics, which includes illustrated examples of acceptable and unacceptable work space configurations, and 2) food safety. According to announcements […]
