Agricultural Law Weekly Review
The Agricultural Law Weekly Review provides an update of recent agricultural law developments from local, state, national, and international levels. Subscribe for updates.
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—May 1, 2023
WOTUS: Sixth Circuit Grants Administrative Stay of WOTUS Rule in Kentucky Until May 10, 2023 🌾
On April 22, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an order granting an administrative stay of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) January 2023 WOTUS final rule (WOTUS). KY v. EPA, No. 23-5343. The Sixth Circuit case is an appeal from the Kentucky federal district court’s previous complete dismissal of the case legally challenging the WOTUS final rule. The administrative stay order was entered twice, once on April 20 and again on April 22, 2023, in response […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—April 24, 2023
Water Quality: EPA Settlement Agreement of Chesapeake Bay TMDL Compliance Litigation Discloses New Pennsylvania Enforcement Policies 🌾
On April 20, 2023, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation announced that a settlement agreement had been reached, subject to court approval, in federal litigation filed by the states of Maryland, Virginia, Delaware, the District of Columbia, and multiple environmental groups against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency seeking to compel enforcement of Pennsylvania’s Chesapeake Bay nutrient and sediment reduction obligations under the Clean Water Act. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 1:20-cv-02529. For a full outline of the EPA’s new […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—April 17, 2023
Water Quality: North Dakota Federal Court Enjoins WOTUS Final Rule in 24 States 🌾
On April 12, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota issued a preliminary injunction immediately effective in 24 states against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) January 2023 WOTUS Final Rule in West Virginia v. U.S. EPA, No. 3:23-cv-00032. In addition to a previously-issued federal court injunction issued in Texas, effective in Texas and Idaho, the new injunction is effective in Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—April 10, 2023
Water Quality: Stay Granted in Litigation on Petition to Compel Revision of Clean Water Act CAFO Regulations 🌾
On April 3, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit entered an order staying a petition for writ of mandamus filed against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by several environmental groups, pursuant to a joint stipulation filed by the parties in the case of Food & Water Watch, et al v. USEPA, No. 22-70226. According to the terms of the stay, EPA must respond by August 15, 2023 to a 2017 petition asking the agency […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—April 3, 2023
Water Quality: U.S. Supreme Court Asked to Hear Appeal Interpreting Citizen Suit Authority Under Clean Water Act 🌾
On January 30, 2023, Dakota Finance LLC (dba Arabella Farms) filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court in a case which may provide clarity to the applicability of the Clean Water Act (CWA)’s authority to pursue citizen suits when a state agency has already commenced enforcement action under a state law “comparable to” the Clean Water Act’s administrative penalty provisions. Dakota Finance LLC, dba Arabella Farm, et al. v. Naturaland Trust, et al. No. 22-720. […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—March 27, 2023
Biosecurity: Pennsylvania Suffers Renewed 2023 HPAI Outbreak, Issues Additional Quarantine Order for Live Bird Market Supply Chain 🌾
From February 1, 2023, through March 17, 2023, Pennsylvania has confirmed thirty-two (32) premises, both commercial and non-commercial, infected by highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in the last eight (8) weeks, totaling approximately 295,000 depopulated birds, primarily smaller mixed species growers (7,000 birds or less) supplying East Coast live bird markets, but also including six (6) commercial production premises (turkey—3, ducks—2, and broilers—1). Twenty-three (23) of the detections have been in Lancaster County, as are the overwhelming majority of active control […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—March 20, 2023
WOTUS: Twenty-Four States File New Complaint Against EPA Challenging New WOTUS Rule 🌾
On February 16, 2023, a coalition of twenty-four states filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota Eastern Division against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers over the new final rule defining “the Waters of the United States” (WOTUS). West Virginia et. al. v. Environmental Protection Agency et al., No. 3:23-cv-00032. The complaint alleges that the final rule regulatorily interprets WOTUS too broadly under the Clean Water Act (CWA), U.S.C. § […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—March 13, 2023
Biotechnology: U.S. Trade Representative Announces USMCA Technical Consultations On Mexican GMO Corn Ban 🌾
On March 6, 2023, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) announced that it is requesting technical consultations with Mexico “regard[ing] certain Mexican measures concerning products of agricultural biotechnology,” i.e., Mexico’s February 13, 2023, decree prohibiting import of genetically modified corn for human consumption. USTR initiates the technical consultations under Article 9.19 of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Chapter of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA). According to a statement issued by USDA Secretary Vilsack, the United States “remain[s] firm in […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—March 6, 2023
COVID-19: SCOTUS Denies Tyson’s Petition to Keep COVID Cases in Federal Court 🌾
On February 21, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) denied Tyson Foods, Inc.’s (Tyson) petition to keep in federal court several negligence cases alleging that the 2020 COVID-related deaths of workers employed at Tyson’s Waterloo, Iowa plant were caused by Tyson’s negligence. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Hus Hari Buljic, et al. No. 22-70. Tyson filed its petition following the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals’s opinion remanding the cases to state court in Fernandez v. Tyson Foods Inc, et al, No. […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—February 27, 2023
Agricultural Labor: D.C. Court Declines to Enjoin 2022 H-2A Regulation Revisions 🌾
On February 16, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a memorandum opinion denying a preliminary injunction against the November 14, 2022, H-2A final rule. National Council of Agricultural Employers v. United States Department of Labor, No:1:22-cv-03569-RC. The case alleges that the Biden Administration’s 2021 Inauguration Day withdrawal of the Trump Administration’s previous version of the H-2A final rule and publication of its own version on October 12, 2022, violated the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). The underlying legal challenge remains […]
