National Agricultural Policy
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—February 13, 2020
National Agricultural Policy: USDA Inspector General Confirms Investigation of Trade Aid Package
On February 11, 2020, USDA Inspector General Phyllis K. Fong confirmed during testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations’ Subcommittee on Agriculture that her office is conducting an investigation of the legal authority and administration of the so-called “Trade Aid Packages” for 2018 and 2019. The trade aid packages were undertaken by USDA pursuant to Section 5 of the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Charter Act of 1948, 15 U.S.C. 714 et seq., to compensate agricultural producers for lost revenue due to Chinese tariff retaliation and trade […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – October 3, 2019
On September 26, 2019, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reversed the Commonwealth Court’s order, holding that local governments cannot impose stricter nutrient management requirements on small farms than those already imposed upon large agricultural operations under the state Nutrient Management Act (NMA) (Russell Berner, et al., v. Montour Township, et al., No. 39 MAP 2018). The question of whether and to what extent the NMA preempts local regulation of agricultural operations that are not “concentrated agricultural operations” (CAOs) became the central issue of this […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – September 19, 2019
On September 12, 2019, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Andrew Wheeler announced the repeal of the 2015 Clean Water Act rule defining “waters of the United States” (WOTUS). According to EPA, the repeal of the 2015 rule is the first step in its two-step approach to redefine WOTUS and clearly distinguish between federally regulated and state-controlled waters. For the second step, EPA proposed a new WOTUS definition in December 2018 (84 FR 4154). The final rule will become active after 60 days once published in the Federal Register. For further […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—August 1, 2019
Food Labeling: Plant-Based Food Company Brings Suit Challenging Arkansas Meat Labeling Law
On July 22, 2019, Tofurky Co., a producer of plant-based food products, brought suit in the Eastern District of Arkansas alleging that the Arkansas law prohibiting the labeling of plant or cell-based products as “meat” violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (Tofurky v. Soman, No. 4:19-cv-514-KGB). Under Arkansas Act 501, the term ‘meat’ is defined as “a portion of a livestock, poultry, or cervid carcass that is edible by humans.” The law further states that the term “‘meat’ does […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—June 27, 2019
Food Policy: SCOTUS Rules USDA Does Not Need to Disclose Certain SNAP Information Under FOIA
On June 24, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court held that under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) does not need to disclose certain private commercial or financial information from retail stores that participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) (Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media, Docket No. 18-481). Previously, Argus Leader Media filed a FOIA request seeking the names and addresses of all retail stores that participated in SNAP for fiscal years 2005 through 2010. Additionally, […]
