International Trade
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—Week Ending May 6, 2022
Avian Influenza: HPAI Confirmed at Thirteen Pennsylvania Commercial Poultry Operations 🌾
Between April 15 through May 14, 2022, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has confirmed thirteen commercial poultry premise/flocks diagnosed with highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in Pennsylvania — 8 in Lancaster County and 5 in Berks County. All premises have been quarantined, through orders of special quarantine, all birds have been depopulated, totally 4.166 million birds) and composted on site. In addition, all commercial poultry facilities within a 10-kilometer (6.2 mile) radius of the infected premises became part of a “Control Zone” […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—Week Ending March 25, 2022
Animal Welfare: U.S. Supreme Court Will Hear Commerce Clause Challenge to California Prop 12 🌾
On March 25, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court, for the eighth time since January 7, 2022, considered the Writ of Certiorari filed by the National Pork Producer Council requesting the Court hear its appeal to overturn the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ July 28, 2021, decision that California’s Proposition 12 does not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause. National Pork Producers Council, et al. v. Karen Ross, No. 21-468. On March 28, 2022, with a one sentence order, the Court granted the petition and […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—Week Ending January 21, 2022
Pesticides/Herbicides: ‘Pure’ Honey Label May Be Deceptive Due to Pesticide Residue
On January 13, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued an order denying in part honey maker Sioux Honey Association Cooperative’s motion to dismiss a claim against it alleging deceptive business practices, false advertising, and unjust enrichment because the company’s SueBee brand honey was labeled with the words “Pure” or “100% Pure” when the honey contained trace amounts of glyphosate. Scholder v. Sioux Honey Association, No. 2:16-cv-05369. Sioux Honey argued that its “Pure” labeling was not misleading because any glyphosate present in […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review—Week Ending January 14, 2022
COVID-19: Supreme Court Grants Stay of OSHA Workplace Vaccination Rule 🌾
On January 13, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court granted applications for a stay of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) November 5, 2021 COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) (86 FR 61402). National Federation of Independent Business, et al., v. OSHA et al., Nos. 21A244 and 21A247. The stay will be in effect until the cases are finally concluded in the federal courts. The cases were also remanded back to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for disposition on […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending November 19, 2021
COVID-19: Federal Courts Affirm Stay and Consolidate Cases Challenging OSHA’s Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard 🌾
On November 12, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion reaffirming the court’s November 6, 2021 temporary stay of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) November 5, 2021 COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard (86 FR 61402). BST Holdings v. OSHA, No. 21-60845. OSHA’s “Emergency Temporary Standard” webpage now states that, although the agency “remains confident in its authority to protect workers in emergencies, OSHA has […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending October 29, 2021
Agribusiness: Federal Court Allows Securities Fraud Claims to Proceed Against Bayer Re: Monsanto Purchase 🌾
On October 19, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order denying Bayer’s motion to dismiss a suit brought by Bayer investors alleging that the company’s actions in connection with its acquisition of Monsanto violated the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund v. Bayer Aktiengesellschaft, No. 3:20-cv-04737. The plaintiffs, multiple pension funds, claim that Bayer misstated the safety of glyphosate and Roundup, Bayer’s own due diligence efforts, and the legal risks […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending October 22, 2021
Animal Welfare: Federal Court Refuses to Dismiss Suit to Compel USDA Regulations on Poultry Processing Plant Animal Handling 🌾
On October 13, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York issued a decision refusing to dismiss two animal welfare organizations’ lawsuit filed against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for refusing to issue regulations governing live animal handling practices at poultry processing plants. Animal Welfare Institute et al. v. Perdue et al., No. 6:20-cv-06595. While the decision rests upon technical legal issues of standing and subject matter jurisdiction, the lawsuit, if successful, would compel USDA […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending August 13, 2021
Pesticides/Herbicides: California State Appellate Court Affirms Verdict in Pilliod v. Monsanto 🌾
On August 9, 2021, the Court of Appeal for the State of California issued an opinion affirming the jury verdict in a glyphosate products liability claim against Monsanto/Bayer. Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto Company, No. A158228. In 2019, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, who alleged that their thirty-year use of Monsanto/Bayer’s glyphosate-based Roundup weed killer caused them both to develop non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, in the amount of $2 billion but the trial court reduced it to $87 million on […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending July 30, 2021
Animal Welfare: Federal Appeals Court Upholds California’s Proposition 12 With Five Months Until Its Effective Date 🌾
On July 28, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision in Nat’l Pork Producers Council, et al v. Karen Ross, et al, No. 20-55631, holding that California’s Proposition 12 in-state production animal confinement standards and in-state sales restriction for products not produced in accordance with them, do not violate the United States Constitution’s Commerce Clause. In upholding Proposition 12’s constitutionality, the Court affirmed the earlier decision upholding Proposition 12 issued by the U. S. District Court for […]
Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending July 2, 2021
Animal Welfare: U.S. Supreme Court Denies Review of Refusal to Grant Injunction Against California’s Proposition 12 🌾
On June 28, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States denied North American Meat Institute’s (NAMI) petition for certiorari from the refusal to grant an injunction against California’s Proposition 12 on the basis that it violates the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause. North American Meat Institute v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, et al., No. 20-1215. Proposition 12 establishes in-state animal confinement standards for egg-laying hens, veal calves, and breeding sows and prohibits the in-state sale of noncompliant products (included […]
