HomeTag: Food Policy

Food Policy

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending May 22, 2020

COVID-19: USDA Announces Details of Direct Payments Portion of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program
On May 19, 2020, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue announced the direct payments portion of the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (RIN 0503-AA65), which will provide $16 billion in direct payments to producers of wool, livestock, dairy, and specialty and non-specialty crops who have experienced a “five-percent-or-greater price decline due to COVID-19.”  Payments are limited to $250,000 “per person or entity” with exceptions for corporate entities of up to three shareholders who “contribute[] substantial labor or management” to operations.  USDA will accept applications […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – February 28, 2020

Food Labeling: Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture Provides Whole Milk Labeling Guidance
On February 19, 2020, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Food Safety issued a guidance document to Pennsylvania dairy processors outlining what methodology can be employed in labeling the fat content of whole milk.  In March 2019, a collection of Pennsylvania dairy farmers formed an advocacy group called “97 Milk, LLC,” which advocates for whole milk consumption and designating whole milk as ‘97% Fat Free.’  However, the guidance document states that, according to FDA, a ‘% Fat Free’ label can only be employed on 1% Low Fat or Skim milk […]

February 27th, 2020|Tags: , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – January 23, 2020

International Trade: USMCA Receives Congressional Approval, Awaits President’s Signature
On January 16, 2020, the U.S. Congress completed the statutory approval process for the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).  It now awaits the formal application of the President’s signature, which has yet to be scheduled.  Pursuant to the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015, 19 U.S.C. 4201 et seq., (generally referred to as “Trade Promotion Authority” or “TPA”), Congress granted approval through passage of HR 5430, titled the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act.  HR 5430 was introduced on December 13, 2019, passed the U.S. House by a 385-41 […]

January 24th, 2020|Tags: , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – November 7, 2019

Agricultural Finance:  Chapter 12 Farm Bankruptcies Increasing
On October 30, 2019, American Farm Bureau (AFB) released a market intelligence report authored by Chief Economist John Newton showing that Chapter 12 farm bankruptcy filings rose 24% in the 12-month period ending September 2019 as compared to the same period one year earlier.  There were a total of 580 Chapter 12 filings, which nevertheless remains lower than the recent high of 676 filings in 2011.  Individual state and regional filings varied greatly but nine states recorded totals at or above 10-year highs (Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Wisconsin […]

November 7th, 2019|Tags: , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – October 24, 2019

Invasive Species: USDA Announces Plum Pox Virus Eradicated in U.S.
On October 17, 2019, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Under Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory Programs Greg Ibach announced the elimination of Plum Pox Virus (PPV) within the United States.  PPV is a viral disease-causing deformities and decay in stone fruits such as peaches, nectarines, apricots, almonds, cherries, and plums, which typically exhibit severe symptoms.  PPV can also infect popular garden items including tomatoes, peas, petunias, and zinnias.  According to the USDA, while PPV does not kill trees and is not harmful to humans or animals, it lowers fruit production and marketability, causing economic damage to […]
October 24th, 2019|Tags: , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – October 10, 2019

Taxation: IRS Announces Livestock Replacement Extension for Farmers Affected by Drought.
On September 30, 2019, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced a one-year extension for farmers to replace livestock sold in response to severe drought conditions.  According to Notice 2006-82, qualifying sales are limited to livestock owned for draft, dairy, or breeding purposes.  The livestock must have been sold entirely on account of drought, and the farmer or rancher must have qualified for the four-year replacement period.  Farmers in applicable regions may now delay replacing livestock until the end of the tax year following the “first drought-free year” and may also defer capital […]
October 23rd, 2019|Tags: , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—August 29, 2019

Checkoff Programs: Court Dismisses Challenge Regarding Use of Pork Checkoff Funds
On August 23, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit dismissed a lawsuit alleging that the government improperly used funds collected under the pork checkoff program (Humane Society of the United States v. Perdue, No. 18-5188).  Under the Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act, the government may collect “assessments” from producers for the purpose of “strengthen[ing] the position of the pork industry in the marketplace.”  Known as “checkoffs,” these assessments are paid by producers to the National Pork Board (Board) who in turn uses the […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—July 25, 2019

Pesticides: Court Reduces Jury Award in Roundup Case
On July 17, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California reduced a jury damage award regarding the herbicide Roundup from over $80 million to over $25 million (Hardeman v Monsanto Company, 3:16-cv-00525).  Previously, a jury found that plaintiff Edwin Hardeman’s non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was caused by Monsanto’s glyphosate-based herbicide Roundup.  According to the jury, Monsanto had negligently failed to warm Mr. Hardeman of the risks associated with Roundup.  As a result, Mr. Hardeman was awarded $5,267,634.10 in compensatory damages and $75,000,000 in punitive damages.  The court ruled, however, that while “[t]he […]

July 25th, 2019|Tags: , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—June 27, 2019

Food Policy: SCOTUS Rules USDA Does Not Need to Disclose Certain SNAP Information Under FOIA
On June 24, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court held that under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) does not need to disclose certain private commercial or financial information from retail stores that participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) (Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media, Docket No. 18-481).  Previously, Argus Leader Media filed a FOIA request seeking the names and addresses of all retail stores that participated in SNAP for fiscal years 2005 through 2010.  Additionally, […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—June 20, 2019

Air Quality: EPA Issues Final Rule Exempting Animal Waste Air Emissions from EPCRA Reporting
On June 13, 2019, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published notice in the Federal Register of a final rule amending the reporting regulations under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) (84 FR 27533).  Under the final rule, air emissions from animal waste at farms is specifically exempted from EPCRA reporting requirements.  Additionally, EPA stated that the final rule adds definitions to the terms “animal waste” and “farm” to the EPCRA regulations so as “to delineate the scope of this reporting exemption.”  The final rule […]