HomeTag: Dairy Policy

Dairy Policy

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—Weeks Ending December 24 & 31, 2021

Pesticides/Herbicides:  EPA Publishes 2021 Dicamba Report and Addresses 2020 Growing Season 🌾
On December 21, 2021, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a report titled “Status of Over-the-Top Dicamba: Summary of 2021 Usage, Incidents and Consequences of Off-Target Movement, and Impacts of Stakeholder-Suggested Mitigations.”  The report is published to a “nonrulemaking docket” at Regulations.gov titled “Dicamba for Use on Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton and Soybeans”—an official repository for documents not part of a formal EPA rulemaking process but which impact EPA’s October 2020 five-year product registrations for dicamba-containing products.  EPA announced that “[d]espite the control measures implemented in EPA’s […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week ending November 5, 2021

COVID 19:  OSHA Vaccination Mandate Issued and Immediately Stayed by Federal Court 🌾
On November 5, 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) published in the Federal Register, “COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard (86 FR 61402), an interim final rule that consists of an emergency temporary standard (ETS) immediately effective requiring employers of 100 or more employees by December 5, 2021, to “develop, implement, and enforce a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy, with an exception for employers that instead adopt a policy requiring employees to either get vaccinated or elect to undergo […]

November 8th, 2021|Tags: , , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending September 24, 2021

WOTUS: Supreme Court Petition Seeks Review of Rapanos Case Analysis 🌾
On September 24, 2021, Priest Lake, Idaho landowners Michael and Chantell Sackett filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to revisit the court’s 2006 Rapanos decision attempting to define jurisdictional “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act (CWA).  Michael Sackett, et ux. v. EPA, No. 21-454.  In Rapanos v. United States, the plurality opinion, in which four justices joined, determined that the CWA regulates surface waters only when they have a “continuous surface water connection” to […]

September 28th, 2021|Tags: , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending September 10, 2021

Antitrust: White House Announces Intent to Address Effects on Consumers, Farmers and Ranchers of Meat Processing Industry Consolidation 🌾
On September 8, 2021, The White House published a policy outline on its official website titled “Addressing Concentration in the Meat-Processing Industry to Lower Food Prices for American Families” and conducted a Press Briefing with Agriculture Secretary Vilsack and National Economic Council Director Brian Deese in support. According to the document and Press Secretary Jen Psaki, the administration will address the following: (a) a “corporate consolidation problem with meat-processing giants;” (b) measures to reduce consumer prices and increase farmer and rancher […]

September 14th, 2021|Tags: , , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending August 27, 2021

Ag-Gag Statutes: Tenth Circuit Affirms Unconstitutionality of Kansas’s Ag-Gag Law 🌾
On August 19, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued an opinion affirming the district court’s injunction barring enforcement of key provisions of the Kansas Farm Animal and Field Crop and Research Facilities Protection Act (Act). Animal Legal Defense Fund, et al v. Kelly, et al, No. 20-3082; Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Kelly, No. 2:18-cv-02657 (D. Kan.).  Sections (b), (c), and (d) of the Act criminalize “exercising control over,” recording on, and trespassing onto an animal facility “without effective consent of the […]

August 31st, 2021|Tags: , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending August 6, 2021

Animal Welfare: Five U.S. Senators Introduce Federal Legislation to Stop Proposition 12
On August 5, 2021, a group of five U.S. Senators introduced S.2619, titled “Exposing Agricultural Trade Suppression” or “EATS Act,’’ seeking to erase the effect of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ July 28, 2021, ruling upholding California’s Proposition 12 and leaving in place its January 1, 2022 effective date. The bill proposes to prohibit states from imposing requirements on the “production of agricultural products sold or offered for sale in interstate commerce if the production . . . occurs in another state.”  The bill was referred […]

August 13th, 2021|Tags: , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review – Week Ending April 30, 2021

COVID-19: White House Reviewing OSHA’s Long-Delayed Emergency Temporary Standard
On April 26, 2021, according to a U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) spokesperson, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) submitted to the White House an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) for the prevention of workplace COVID-19 transmission.  President Biden’s January 21, 2021 Executive Order on Protecting Worker Health and Safety directed OSHA to decide upon the necessity of an ETS and submit it to the White House by March 15, 2021, however that action was long-delayed without official explanation.  An ETS on this topic would represent the first mandatory federal government […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—Week Ending March 5, 2021

Animal Welfare: U.S. Supreme Court Petitioned to Hear Commerce Clause Challenge to California’s Proposition 12 🌾
On February 26, 2021, the North American Meat Institute (NAMI) filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court requesting that it hear an appeal of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ decision that California’s Proposition 12 does not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause in establishing animal confinement standards for all pork and veal products sold in the state. A response is due from the California Attorney General by April 2, 2021.  North American Meat Institute v. Xavier Becerra, […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—Week Ending February 26, 2021  

Antitrust: Court Grants Preliminary Approval of Civil Antitrust Settlement; Tyson and Pilgrim’s to Pay $155 Million 🌾
On February 25, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued an order granting preliminary approval of the settlements between Defendants Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. and Tyson Foods and the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (DPPs) in the consolidated antitrust class action suit In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation (No. 1:16-cv-08637).  According to the agreement, subject to a June 29, 2021 Fairness Hearing, Pilgrim’s will pay up to $75 million to the DPP Class, which it previously announced. See ALWR—week ending January 15, […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending January 29, 2021  

Executive Branch Transition: White House Executive Order Directs Review of Previous Administration Actions, Cancels and Revokes Others
On January 25, 2021, President Biden published in the Federal Register Executive Order (EO) 13990, titled “Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis.” 86 FR 7037  Among other things, the EO directs agency heads to immediately review all agency actions taken between January 20, 2017 and January 20, 2021 that “are or may be inconsistent with, or present obstacles to” the administration’s voluminous policies articulated in the EO.  The agency heads shall consider suspending, revising […]