HomeTag: Biotechnology

Biotechnology

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending December 18, 2020

Pesticides/Herbicides: Punitive Damages Reduced to $60 Million in Bader Farms Dicamba Case
On November 25, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri issued an opinion and order on post-trial motions reducing to $60 million the February 2020 jury award of $250 million in punitive damages against Monsanto/Bayer and BASF as a result of dicamba-caused property damage to a Missouri peach producer’s orchards in Bader Farms, Inc. v. Monsanto Company, No. 1:16-cv-00299.  For more background, see ALWR—February 20, 2020, “Missouri Federal Jury Returns $265 Million Verdict in Dicamba […]

December 21st, 2020|Tags: , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending November 6, 2020

Agricultural Labor: Department of Labor Modifies H2A Minimum Wage Calculation
On November 5, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Employment and Training Administration published in the Federal Register a final rule titled “Adverse Effect Wage Rate Methodology for the Temporary Employment of H-2A Nonimmigrants in Non-Range Occupations in the United States” (85 FR 70445), which changes the calculation method of the Adverse Effect Wage Rate (AEWR), or the minimum wage for agricultural guest workers.  Under the final rule, DOL will base the AEWR for field and livestock workers on the 2019 Farm Labor Survey (FLS) “average annual gross […]

November 9th, 2020|Tags: , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending September 4, 2020

Industrial Hemp: USDA Reopens Comment Period for Hemp Production Rule
On September 4, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) announced the reopening (85 FR 55363) of the comment period for the October 31, 2019 interim final rule, “Establishment of a Domestic Hemp Production Program” (84 FR 58522).  USDA states that it is especially interested in comments from regulated parties operating during the 2020 production season and outlines the following twelve issues on which it particularly seeks comment:

  1. Measurement of Uncertainty for Sampling
  2. Liquid Chromatography Factor, 0.877
  3. Disposal and Remediation of Non-Compliant Plants
  4. Negligence
  5. Interstate […]
September 7th, 2020|Tags: , , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending August 21, 2020

Agricultural Labor: H-2A Rule Extends Petition Filing Deadline
On August 20, 2020, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published in the Federal Register a temporary final rule titled, “Temporary Changes to Requirements Affecting H-2A Nonimmigrants Due To the COVID-19 National Emergency: Partial Extension of Certain Flexibilities” (85 FR 51304).  The new rule impacts the April 20, 2020 temporary final rule (85 FR 21739) by extending the deadline for employees to file an extension of stay petition until December 17, 2020.  Additionally, an employee may begin working for a new employer immediately once the petition is received by the […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending July 17, 2020

Dairy Policy: PA Milk Marketing Board Executes Dean Foods Bond Claims
On July 8, 2020, the Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board (PMMB) issued multiple consent orders establishing over $9.2 million in claims against the Milk Dealer Corporate Surety Bonds of four Dean Foods subsidiaries for failing to pay dairy farmer cooperative Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) for Pennsylvania-produced milk delivered to Dean Foods facilities during the course of the Dean Foods bankruptcy.  Bond claims were filed against Dean Dairy Holdings, LLC ($900,198.79); Garelick Farms, LLC Burlington ($3,262,196.63); Suiza Dairy Group, LLC ($13,420.80); and Tuscan/Lehigh Dairies, Inc.— Lansdale and […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending July 3, 2020

COVID-19: Paycheck Protection Program Extended
On June 30 and July 1, 2020, the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives respectively passed S.4116, which extends the June 30, 2020 Paycheck Protection Program application deadline to August 8, 2020.  The bill awaits the President’s signature.

Crop Insurance: Notice of Loss Filing Requirements Eased
On July 2, 2020, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Farm Service Agency (FSA) announced several “flexibilities” for producers filing a Notice of Loss on both insured and uninsured crops for prevented planted acres and failed crops.  RMA states that a Notice of Loss “can be filed before completing the crop acreage report,” […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending May 22, 2020

COVID-19: USDA Announces Details of Direct Payments Portion of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program
On May 19, 2020, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue announced the direct payments portion of the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (RIN 0503-AA65), which will provide $16 billion in direct payments to producers of wool, livestock, dairy, and specialty and non-specialty crops who have experienced a “five-percent-or-greater price decline due to COVID-19.”  Payments are limited to $250,000 “per person or entity” with exceptions for corporate entities of up to three shareholders who “contribute[] substantial labor or management” to operations.  USDA will accept applications […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review —January 16, 2020

International Trade:  United States and China Sign Agreement Impacting Agricultural Exports To China
On January 15, 2020, The United States and the People’s Republic of China executed an agreement titled, “Economic and Trade Agreement Between the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China,” which serves as a settlement agreement of certain enforcement actions initiated by the White House under authority of Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.  According to the February 27, 2019 testimony of United States Trade Representative (USTR) Robert Lighthizer before the House and Ways Committee, such an agreement does not require […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—August 1, 2019

Food Labeling: Plant-Based Food Company Brings Suit Challenging Arkansas Meat Labeling Law
On July 22, 2019, Tofurky Co., a producer of plant-based food products, brought suit in the Eastern District of Arkansas alleging that the Arkansas law prohibiting the labeling of plant or cell-based products as “meat” violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (Tofurky v. Soman, No. 4:19-cv-514-KGB).  Under Arkansas Act 501, the term ‘meat’ is defined as “a portion of a livestock, poultry, or cervid carcass that is edible by humans.”  The law further states that the term “‘meat’ does […]

Agricultural Law in the Spotlight: Understanding Legal Protections and Potential Liabilities Associated with Seed Use in Pennsylvania

With the calendar marking the start of spring, much of Pennsylvania’s agricultural industry has turned its attention to the upcoming planting season. As they do each year, farmers are making decisions about the varieties of seed that they will be purchasing as well as where they will be purchasing this seed. In making these important decisions, farmers should be aware that there are several laws – at both the state and federal level – addressing their purchase and use of seed.

This article will discuss the Pennsylvania Seed Act, federal patent law, and the federal Plant Variety Protection Act. These laws […]

March 28th, 2017|Tags: , , , |