HomeTag: Antitrust

Antitrust

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—Week Ending March 19, 2021

Water Quality: Exelon’s Conowingo Dam Relicensed As Per Settlement with Maryland 🌾
On March 18, 2021, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a new 50-year license to Exelon Generation Company, LLC’s Conowingo Hydroelectric Project, the nearly century-old dam located on the Susquehanna River in Maryland approximately ten miles north of its entry to the Chesapeake Bay.  Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Project Nos. 405-106 and 405-121, 174 FERC ¶ 61,217. In recent years it was discovered that previous modeling of phosphorous, nitrogen and sediment trapped behind the dam were flawed and pollutants previously assumed to be trapped behind the dam […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—Week Ending February 26, 2021  

Antitrust: Court Grants Preliminary Approval of Civil Antitrust Settlement; Tyson and Pilgrim’s to Pay $155 Million 🌾
On February 25, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued an order granting preliminary approval of the settlements between Defendants Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. and Tyson Foods and the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (DPPs) in the consolidated antitrust class action suit In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation (No. 1:16-cv-08637).  According to the agreement, subject to a June 29, 2021 Fairness Hearing, Pilgrim’s will pay up to $75 million to the DPP Class, which it previously announced. See ALWR—week ending January 15, […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending January 22, 2021  

The Agricultural Law Weekly Review has migrated to our new website at https://aglaw.psu.edu/topics/ag-law-weekly-review/.  If you have already subscribed, you will continue to receive emails. If you are interested in receiving other publications from the Center, you can subscribe here

Industrial Hemp: USDA Publishes Final Hemp Rule
On January 19, 2021, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Agriculture Marketing Service (AMS) published in the Federal Register a final rule titled “Establishment of a Domestic Hemp Production Program” (86 FR 5596), which completes the closely-followed process begun by the October 31, 2019 interim final rule to complete regulations governing domestic […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending January 15, 2021

Agricultural Labor: Maryland Court of Appeals Finds Tyson Farms Not Co-Employer of Poultry Farm Employee
On November 20, 2020, the Court of Appeals of Maryland issued an opinion reversing the decision of the Maryland Court of Special Appeals and finding that Tyson Farms was not a co-employer of a Maryland poultry farm worker who sustained an occupational lung disease during his employment and residence on a Worcester County chicken farm.  In overturning a jury verdict from the Circuit Court for Worcester County, which found Tyson not to be a joint employer, the majority of a Maryland Court of Special Appeals panel reversed the trial court and determined that Tyson was a co-employer with the farm owner—who had failed to carry worker’s compensation insurance—and […]

January 15th, 2021|Tags: , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending November 13, 2020

International Trade: EU Imposes Tariffs on U.S. Agricultural Products
On November 9, 2020, the European Commission announced the passage of Regulation 2020/1646, which levies a new 25% World Trade Organization (WTO)-authorized tariff on enumerated U.S. agricultural products (and 15% on U.S. aircraft products) in retaliation for U.S. tariffs on European Union (EU) exports.  Agricultural product tariffs, including on a wide range of cheeses, are being bi-laterally utilized by both nations as retaliation for government subsidies to Airbus and Boeing respectively.  On November 10, 2020, the primary trade organization of U.S. dairy cooperatives, National Milk Producers Federation, issued […]

November 16th, 2020|Tags: , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending October 23, 2020

Animal Welfare: Ninth Circuit Upholds Denial of Injunction Against California’s Proposition 12
On October 15, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a memorandum disposition affirming the U.S. District Court (USDC) for the Central District of California’s November 22, 2019, denial of a preliminary injunction against California’s Proposition 12North American Meat Institute, et al. v. Becerra, et al., No. 19-56408.  The underlying complaint remains pending before the district court. North American Meat Institute et al. v. Becerra, et al., 2:19-cv-08569.  Proposition 12 requires that all pigs, veal calves and egg-laying hens housed in […]

October 26th, 2020|Tags: , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending October 16, 2020

Antitrust: JBS Subsidiary Pilgrim’s Pride Pleads Guilty to Price-Fixing
On October 14, 2020, Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (Pilgrim’s), a wholly-owned subsidiary of JBS S.A., issued an announcement stating that it has entered into a plea agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding its involvement in broiler chicken price-fixing.  According to the announcement, Pilgrim’s will pay $110,524,140 in exchange for no further charges if remaining in compliance with the plea agreement, which remains subject to approval from the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. United States v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, No. 1:20-cr-00330.  Multiple over parties remain […]

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending October 9, 2020

Antitrust: U.S. Department of Justice Indicts Six More Poultry Executives Over Alleged Price Fixing
On October 7, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice announced a grand jury indictment in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado of six additional poultry executives for conspiring to rig bids and fix prices of U.S. broiler chickens in violation of the Sherman Act: Timothy R. Mulrenin, William Vincent Kantola, Jimmie Lee Little, William Wade Lovette, Gary Brian Roberts, and Rickie Patterson Blake. United States v. Penn, No. 1:20-cr-00152.  Four indictments were previously issued in the same proceeding.   […]

October 12th, 2020|Tags: , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending October 2, 2020

International Trade: USDA and FDA Sign MOU to Coordinate, Collaborate on Dairy Exports
On October 1, 2020, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced their establishment of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU 225-20-017), indicating their intent to cooperate and collaborate regarding the export of milk and milk products from the United States.  Under the MOU, FAS will lead communications with foreign governments while AMS will facilitate exports and issue dairy sanitary certificates.  Additionally, FDA will verify the regulatory standing of milk producers and […]

October 5th, 2020|Tags: , , , , , |

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—week ending June 12, 2020

Pesticides: EPA Cancels Dicamba Product Registrations and That Action is Immediately Challenged in Court
On June 8, 2020, The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a “Final Cancellation Order,” effective retroactively to June 3, 2020, of the 2018 product registrations of dicamba herbicides Xtendimax, Engenia, and FeXapan in order to comply with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s (Ninth Circuit) June 3, 2020, decision invalidating those three registrations as having been granted in violation of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).  EPA’s order states that existing stock in the possession of commercial […]

June 14th, 2020|Tags: , , , |